FORGOT YOUR DETAILS?

Why Serverless Won’t Replace Traditional Servers

by / Thursday, 16 May 2019 / News Category Business 2 Community

bsdrouin / Pixabay

Curious why serverless is so popular – and why it won’t replace traditional servers in the cloud?

In the current cloud infrastructure, top service providers are dedicating a great deal of effort to expand on this architecture as a new approach to a cloud solution that focuses on applications rather than infrastructure. Today we’ll take a look at what serverless computing is good for, and what it can’t replace.

Understanding Serverless

For starters, serverless mostly refers to an application or API that depends on third-party, cloud-hosted applications and services, to manage server-side logic and state, propagating code hosted on Function as a Service (FaaS) platforms.

Even though the name “serverless” suggests that there are no servers involved, there will always be servers in use. Rather, it makes it so developers don’t have to deal directly with the servers – it is more about the implementation and management of them. To power serverless workloads, cloud providers use automated systems that eliminate the need for server administrators, offering developers a way to manage applications and services without having to handle, tweak or scale the actual server infrastructure.

Top Serverless Providers

It is no surprise the top cloud providers that are investing in a major way on serverless include AWS, Microsoft Azure, and Google Cloud. In brief, here is how they approach serverless computing.

AWS Lambda is the current leader among serverless compute implementations. Lambda handles everything by automatically scaling your application by running your code as it’s triggered.

Microsoft Azure Functions enables you to run code-on-demand without having to explicitly provision or manage infrastructure.

Google Cloud Functions is a compute solution for creating event-driven applications and connects with GCP services by listening for and responding to events without needing to provision or manage servers.

Advantages and When to Use Serverless

Let’s look at why serverless is often a good choice. It allows organizations to reduce operational complications associated with infrastructure and related cost expenditures since they are computed for the actual usage or work the serverless platform performs.

When it comes to implementing, maintaining, debugging, monitoring the infrastructure, and setting up your environment, with serverless the heavy lifting is done for you. It allows developers to focus on application development, and not complex infrastructures, thus promoting team efficiency, better serving the customers and focusing on business goals.

Since serverless cost models are based on execution only, using serverless will reduce your costs of operations and save you money on cloud spend, making it more adaptable for short-term tasks on your environment, however, there are hidden costs to be aware of. Though we are considering advantages, this might as well be a disadvantage. Serverless apps rely on API calls, and the heavy use of API request can become very pricey indeed. In addition, networking costs can get very expensive when sending a lot of data and are generally more difficult to track in serverless costs models.

Some of the best use cases for serverless are:

  • Brand new applications that don’t already have an existing workload
  • Microservices-based architectures, with small chunks of code working together
  • Infrequently-used scripts that don’t need a server running 24/7

Disadvantages and When Not to Use Serverless

No doubt, there is an increased interest in serverless, but there are limitations that come with it. Perhaps these trade-offs are the reasons as to why some companies, though interested in serverless, are not ready to make the jump from traditional servers just yet.

Networking on serverless must be done through a private API endpoint and cannot be accessed through IPs, which can lead to vendor lock-in. This makes serverless unsuitable for long-term tasks, making serverless unusable for applications that have variable execution times, and for services that require information from an external source.

Serverless creates dependency upon cloud providers, and because of this you are not able to port your applications between different providers. Cloud providers own the burden of resource provisioning, so they are solely responsible for ensuring that the application instance has the back-end infrastructure it needs to execute when summoned.

By adopting serverless, you forfeit complete control over your infrastructure, like for example, scaling. Scaling is done automatically, but the absence of control makes it difficult to address and migrate errors related to serverless instances. This lack of control also applies to application performance issues, a metric that developers still need to worry about in a serverless environment. After all, serverless providers depend on an actual server that needs to be accessed and monitored.

Serverless is likely not a good fit for:

  • Rewriting existing apps
  • Applications with variable execution times
  • Long-term tasks
  • Monolithic applications

Why Serverless Won’t Replace Traditional Servers

Though every business has different needs when it comes to cloud infrastructures, serverless won’t surmount the current cloud infrastructure of traditional servers completely. There are too many use cases where serverless is not applicable, or not worth the tradeoff in control (or perhaps the cost – stay tuned for a future post on this). But as cloud service providers continue to invest heavily on serverless, it is fair to say that serverless usage will continue to grow in the years to come.

Read more on Business 2 Community 

Related News
Critics ripped Mayor de Blasio Sunday for going along with a $10 million scheme to replace the wood on Coney Island's iconic Riegelmann Boardwalk with concrete and plastic. “He's wrong! This... ...
READ MORE
Hooters avoids hiring men as servers.Read more from Business Insider.Read more on NewsOK.comRead more on Newsok
READ MORE
TheDigitalArtist / PixabayMulti-cloud environments are complex. Between complicated pricing structures and novel cloud services, enterprises are faced with a huge challenge when it comes to effectively managing these distributed networks.One ...
READ MORE
EAST LANSING, Mich. (AP) — The latest on Michigan lawmakers embroiled in an extramarital affair cover-up (all times local):4:40 p.m.Special primary and general elections will be held Nov. Read more ...
READ MORE
IT leaders who “teach employees to fish” may be feeding the business for a lifetime.Many IT leaders and even CIOs today are missing an opportunity. Their teams spend all day ...
READ MORE
Sharlyn Lauby of HR Bartender recently wrote an article about why managers’ goal should be to find and hire their replacements. She writes,“If a manager takes their role seriously, then ...
READ MORE
Seriously though, is traditional PR pitching as ancient in practice as handline fishing or rain dancing? Ultimately, that’s up to the individual PR practitioner to decide, but if you’re reading ...
READ MORE
A restaurateur violated a male applicant's human rights when he posted a job ad seeking “female only” servers, the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal ruled despite hearing evidence the man might ...
READ MORE
Critics rip de Blasio’s plan to replace Coney
The strange loophole that lets Hooters hire only
The Importance of Centralizing Tagging in a Multi-Cloud
The Latest: Special elections set to replace 2
IT Leaders: 5 Reasons to Encourage Citizen Development
Managers Should Replace Themselves. Here’s How…
Has the Traditional PR Pitch Gone the Way
‘Innate harm’ to tell men they’re not wanted,
Share Button

Leave a Reply

TOP